CVER's Chiara Cavaglia, Sandra McNally and Gu Ventura discuss the evolution of apprenticeships in England over the last 20 years.
The number of apprenticeship starts in England has reduced dramatically in recent years following government reforms and the COVID-19 pandemic. The composition has also shifted from almost complete domination by low and intermediate level apprenticeships to one where higher and degree apprenticeships constitute a significant share (26 per cent in 2020). Even though the number of apprenticeships has decreased, policy changes have likely improved their average quality. One might characterise the changes (at least up until the pandemic) as a substitution of quantity for quality. But this might have come at the cost of less equitable access with, for example, those living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods losing out from these changes.
Our report, ‘The recent evolution of apprenticeship participation and pathways’ documents these trends and assesses how
they have affected different groups of people - by age group, socio-economic
background, gender and ethnicity. We also look at the prior attainment of
individuals undertaking different types of apprenticeship, the extent of
progression and drop-out rates across apprenticeship types. Finally, we
interpret what these patterns imply for broader concerns on the efficacy of the
system and for social mobility. We study the change in apprenticeships between
August 2014 and July 2020, using comprehensive national data (the Individual
Learner Record). For younger age groups, we can link information to school
records.
Changes in the number and
composition of apprenticeships were strongly influenced by changes in
government policy over these years, which included the overhaul of how
apprenticeships are funded (with the introduction of the Apprenticeship Levy
from 2017), the replacement of apprenticeship frameworks by employer-led
standards, and new rules aimed at improving the quality of training
(including a minimum duration, a minimum threshold for off-the-job training and
a more rigorous final assessment). In line with these efforts, there has been a
marked increase in the planned duration of apprenticeships. The net impact on
productivity depends on whether the improvement in quality offsets the fall in
numbers and the extent to which newer (more expensive) apprenticeships are
displacing pre-existing forms of training (which is difficult to evaluate).
Changes in number and type of
apprenticeships on offer appear to have had distributional implications.
Whereas in 2015 apprenticeship starts were more frequently observed among
people living in the most deprived fifth of neighbourhoods of England, by 2020
they were more evenly split across types of neighbourhood. This change is
driven by bigger relative falls in lower-level apprenticeships (Levels 2 and 3)
in more deprived neighbourhoods, particularly among older individuals. Young
individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds are less and less represented at
successively higher levels of apprenticeship. In fact, they are more likely to start
a university degree than to study for a degree apprenticeship. Cast in this
light, it is difficult to see such apprenticeships as being a route to improve
social mobility.
Unlike in most other countries,
apprenticeships in England are not predominantly used to facilitate the
transition from school to work. Individuals over 25 years of age account for 40
per cent of all apprentices. Further, they account for the vast majority of those
undertaking higher apprenticeships (at Levels 4 and 5) and over half of those
undertaking degree apprenticeships. This matters because returns to
apprenticeships are considerably higher for younger individuals (McIntosh and
Morris, 2018). Women and ethnic minorities are under-represented among
younger apprentices (up to age 25).
Another part of the story is that
drop-out rates across apprenticeship types are relatively high. About 11 to 26
per cent of individuals drop out within one year (depending on the level of the
apprenticeship and the age of the apprentice). The overall achievement rate
varies between 60 and 70 per cent, which is lowest for older individuals (25+)
on higher apprenticeships and highest for younger people on Level 3
apprenticeships. The fact that so many individuals fail to complete their
apprenticeship is a cause for concern, especially given the high subsidy from
the taxpayer.
Overall, our report points to
improvements in the quality of apprenticeships on offer but fewer possibilities
to access them because of their reduced number and more stringent academic
requirements when offered at higher levels. Questions for policy makers include
whether there ought to be more explicit targeting of firm-level incentives towards
younger people and how opportunities may be made more widely available for
those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
CVER Discussion Paper 039, The Recent Evolution of Apprenticeships: Participation and Pathways is published 8 December 2022. Link: https://cver.lse.ac.uk/textonly/cver/pubs/cverdp039.pdf.